Modern English is a living language and therefore is in a constant state of change. Words are added, alternate syntax is attested, and writing reflects speech. Since the written word is a tool of speech, it is natural that student writing would be composed in such a way that reflects how the student speaks. While this is good for personal expression, it is typically not accepted as "academic" or Standard English writing. Language is so powerful and influential that students must be taught how to communicate using "Standard English." It IS difficult to explain to students the rules of standard English and where they came from. I think one of the best ways to do this is to have students read several essays, written in 'home' language and 'cash' language and have them compare and contrast. Which do they think sound better? Which one would a college professor or potential employer like to read? I would like to have students try writing their own essay using their own home language and then "translate" it into the cash language. Hopefully it would help transition into a lesson in revision and settle disputes over the use of language.
I have mixed feelings about Christensen's "Tea Party" exercise. First, very few middle school or high school males would willingly participate in a classroom activity entitled "Tea Party." Perhaps something along the lines of "Dramatis Persona" or "What's In A Name." Having the students do this activity must serve a higher purpose. I think this exercise is good for helping students create, develop, and explain characters. It is also a good tool for exploring the characters in the novels or short stories that we cover in class.
No comments:
Post a Comment